This was posted today at the US Department of Justice and is being shared throughout Facebook.

🌈🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌞🌈

U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Solicitor General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC 20530
February 20, 2025

Multilayer Restrictions on the Removal of Administrative Law Judges Declared Unconstitutional

Washington, D.C.— The Department of Justice (DOJ) has formally determined that multiple layers of removal restrictions for Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) in 5 U.S.C. 1202(d) and 7521(a) violate the Constitution. The Department will no longer defend these restrictions in court and has affirmed this position in ongoing litigation.

Constitutional Violations & Judicial Overreach

In Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB, 561 U.S. 477 (2010), the Supreme Court ruled that multilayer protection from removal violates Article II by unlawfully restricting the President’s executive authority. The ruling clarified that the President must not be restricted in his ability to remove executive officers, including inferior officers such as ALJs.

Further, statutory provisions restricting the President’s ability to remove principal officers—who in turn are blocked from removing inferior executive officers—are unconstitutional. The DOJ has determined that ALJs operating under these unlawful protections lack any valid judicial standing.

Implications & Trump’s Article II Authority

Pursuant to Article II of the Constitution, the President has the full authority and obligation to:
• Immediately terminate all unlawful ALJs operating in federal tribunals.
• Override unconstitutional restrictions that hinder executive authority.
• Restore full due process protections for the American people by removing unlawful administrative courts.

Justice Neil Gorsuch has extensively criticized the use of unconstitutional administrative proceedings that bypass the constitutional right to a jury trial and unlawfully strip people of their property without due process. He has stated:

“Government agencies have been acting as judge, jury, and executioner—without any lawful authority.”

BAR Guild Control & Fraudulent Securities

The DOJ has further identified the unlawful influence of private BAR guild members controlling these corporate tribunals, which are:

✅ Operating under statutory fraud rather than constitutional law.
✅ Engaged in securities trading via Court Registry Investment Systems (CRIS).
✅ Facilitating land title fraud through Land Registries, Westpac, ASIC, AFSA, and others.

The Clearfield Doctrine (2008) confirms that when government agencies trade securities, they forfeit their sovereign immunity and become private entities engaging in commerce. Unlawful administrative courts are operating as for-profit corporate entities, in direct violation of:
• The Constitution’s separation of powers
• The right to due process & jury trials
• Federal law prohibiting unauthorized securities trading

The President Must Act Now

Given these findings, President Trump holds the full authority under Article II to:

📌 Dissolve unconstitutional administrative courts.
📌 Fire ALJs operating without constitutional standing.
📌 Shut down unlawful securities trading schemes.
📌 Restore due process, property rights, and financial justice to the people.

The NACC and other corruption commissions have failed to investigate these systemic violations. The DOJ calls for immediate corrective action to dismantle this unlawful system.

DOJ Position & Next Steps

The DOJ will no longer defend these unconstitutional restrictions in court and reaffirms that:

➡️ ALJs have no lawful judicial standing.
➡️ President Trump has the authority to dissolve these administrative courts immediately.
➡️ All fraudulent securities trading and land registry fraud must be exposed and prosecuted.

For further inquiries, please contact:
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Solicitor General
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC 20530

Of note Chief Justice Neil Gorsuch