YES!!! This...

𝗦𝗖𝗢𝗧𝗨𝗦 𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗙 𝗥𝗨𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗜𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗦𝗣𝗨𝗡 𝗔𝗦 𝗔 “𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗟𝗢𝗦𝗦” — 𝗜𝗧’𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧
⁣⁣⁣The media is already doing the victory lap.
Headlines screaming like American trade policy just collapsed overnight.
Calm down. That’s not what the ruling actually did.
Here’s the real context they’re conveniently leaving out:
The Supreme Court didn’t ban tariffs.
They didn’t kill Trump’s trade strategy.
They ruled that ⁣𝗜𝗘𝗘𝗣𝗔 (𝟭𝟵𝟳𝟳 𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 𝗟𝗔𝗪)⁣ can’t be used for sweeping global tariffs without clear Congressional authorization.
That’s a ⁣𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗖𝗘𝗗𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗟𝗜𝗠𝗜𝗧⁣ — not a policy funeral.
⁣⁣⁣And yes, the opinion was written by Roberts, with Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissenting — which already tells you this was a legal scope fight, not some ideological “tariffs are illegal” bombshell.
⁣⁣⁣Now here’s the part the media narrative is deliberately glossing over:
⁣⁣⁣𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟮𝟯𝟮 𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗙𝗦?⁣
Still in place.
⁣𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟯𝟬𝟭 𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗔 𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗙𝗦?⁣
Still standing.
⁣𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗔𝗨𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬?⁣
Untouched.
⁣⁣⁣Those are the tariffs that actually reshaped supply chains, punished dumping, and forced real negotiations.
Not gone. Not struck down. Not even weakened.
⁣⁣⁣What the Court basically said is:
⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘴, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯.
That’s separation of powers. Not surrender.
⁣⁣⁣Meanwhile the White House isn’t panicking.
They’re already pivoting to:
⁣𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗔𝗖𝗧,
⁣𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗔𝗨𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗘𝗦,
and yes — Congress if needed.
That’s called ⁣𝗔𝗗𝗔𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗟𝗘𝗚𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗚𝗬⁣, not losing.
⁣⁣⁣The left is celebrating like U.S. manufacturing just got handed back to China on a silver platter.
It didn’t.
⁣⁣⁣Tariffs that protect American steel, aluminum, and strategic industries are ⁣𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗟𝗟 𝗙𝗨𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘⁣.
The leverage at the negotiating table?
Still there.
Factories coming back?
That economic pressure tool didn’t magically vanish because of one statutory interpretation ruling.
⁣⁣⁣Let’s be blunt:
This wasn’t a rejection of tariffs.
It was a limitation on using one specific emergency law as a catch-all shortcut.
⁣⁣⁣And if anything, it forces a more durable path — one backed by clearer legal authority that’s harder to challenge long-term.
⁣⁣⁣So no, this is not some grand collapse of Trump’s trade agenda.
It’s a legal speed bump.
Not a strategic defeat.
⁣⁣⁣We don’t lose.
We pivot, reauthorize, and hit the table with stronger footing.